Over the years, many scholars have faced the issue of not being conversant with the knowledge of an annotated bibliography format. In this article, we'll focus mainly on the steps of how to write an annotated bibliography, answer the question "What is an annotated bibliography?" and add examples for more understanding. Though like most assignments, annotated compilations aren't any different. They require thorough investigation; therefore, as much as we'll show how to write this bibliography, you also need to take a personal initiative to be careful with your investigation. With that, here are the instructions for the annotated bibliography format.
For a long time, the question "What is an annotated bibliography?" has been commonly asked by scholars globally. Well, an annotated bibliography is an account of one's investigation concerning a specific subject, and with the same bibliography format, all the resources are listed alphabetically. The difference between the annotated bibliography and other articles is that it gives precise data concerning the source's importance and summary's assessment. Depending on what you're assigned, the report might either be independent or dependent on another more significant investigation conspiracy.
Depending on the task given, an annotated bibliography has various purposes:
As you are learning how to write an annotated bibliography for article, it's essential to know that the importance and uniqueness of a compilation rest entirely on how you've selected your resources. Begin with the definition of your investigation carefully, so you'll be able to determine what should be added and removed in your article. Try to make your work comprehensive within reasonable boundaries, and these are some of the questions you need to take seriously:
Footnotes for brief periods are used to restate the source's primary argument. A footnote of an academic source gives the theory an identity of its exclusive methods of investigation and the main final thoughts. Always remember that knowing the source's argument is different from giving a description or putting down its contents.
Example: Only Gives the Contents
James. H. Anderson (2010). Middle East Refugees "Equal Rights."
This article talks about the recent constitutional discussions concerning the rights of Middle East refugees in Germany. It also discusses the decisions made by the Supreme Court concerning the equality of refugees (2010).
These reading strategies can give you enough closure on identifying your source's argument:
Your bibliography should briefly assess the source's value to the investigation process, be it a question or an issue. If your literature is a part of your conspiracy, then concisely show what you intend to do with the source and the reason why. If the conspiracy's independent, then assess the contribution towards the subject's investigation by the source:
For you to fully determine how it is, you'll use the source for contribution definition. You'll have to assess the argument's quality and the reason it's of value. How well have you defined the investigation problem? What are the drawbacks? Why is the investigation valuable? How competent is the evidence? From the evidence, can you come up with the same final thoughts? How thorough are your investigative techniques?
Keep your investigation's context in mind and how the material needs to be assessed, and finally, the models required to evaluate your claims in the course resources.
Annotated bibliographies are used in many variations. Pay attention to the needs of your assignment, and these are some of the possible changes:
This question has been frequently asked over the years by learners of all levels. Well, to start with, an abstract deals with descriptive summaries that are found in every scholarly journal, specifically at the beginning. In periodical indexes, footnotes have a critical and explanatory nature which might be used in explaining the author's view concerning expressive clarity and appropriateness.
Coming up with an annotated bibliography needs the application of various intellectual skills: brief exposition, well-investigated data, and analysis. Start by locating the record quotations to books, documents, periodicals, which may have useful data concerning your subject. Examine briefly and choose the works which give a variety of perspectives concerning the matter.
Have the book article document quoted with the necessary style. With a brief footnote, summarize a central theme together with the scope of the article/book. Include a few more sentences with the authority evaluation and the author's background. Leave comments for the intended audience, compare your work to another you have quoted and finally leave an explanation of why this work affects your annotated bibliography subject.
Majorly there are two types of bibliographies, and they are:
The descriptive/informative annotated bibliography is the one that gives a description or briefly summarizes the source. It describes the reason as to why a specific source is useful when it comes to investigating a specific subject. It has distinctive features that give the audience a clear view concerning the author's main arguments without evaluating what the author's final thoughts are.
Here is an annotated bibliography example:
Breeding a High Generation (2007 June 21st). The Idealist 345 (789)
This editorial is from the Idealist, and it gives a thorough description of video games and how it affects those who play them. The author points out that new media critics are mostly people who are above 35, and it's an issue where generations cannot understand each other. As today's youth grows older, there are high chances that the controversy will come to an end.
The author emphasizes that the age factor is the main reason that opposes the popularity of video games. He also stresses the fact that excellent gaming has transformed the lives of many people. This article is purposely meant for the general audience because it argues on both sides of different generations.
With that, take a closer look at the final sentences as they point out the article's distinctive features and not the author's conclusion.
An analytical/critical footnote only gives a synopsis of the material being said. It also shows the distinctive features concerning an item and also analyses the author's final thoughts. Most annotated bibliographies focus on the analytical investigation that's conducted.
Now that you've started writing your own annotated bibliography, you should consider the following instructions:
According to the preference of your tutor, an annotated bibliography example can be arranged either chronologically or alphabetically. Therefore, it's essential to check what they prefer.
Always remember that citations can be formatted appropriately. Guidelines concerning the APA, MLA, and Chicago style can be acquired at the UMUC Library. If that's still unsatisfactory, then you can seek more advice from your tutor.
Like any other article, an investigation has always been paramount; therefore, concerning your conspiracy, make sure you've packed up with data.
Every source in your bibliography should be quoted with the APA format. Ensure that under each source you've got at least two paragraphs.
Always remember, as you learn how to write an annotated bibliography for article that a clear and concise summary is important. Any other form of publication offers enough data to provide a reader decision on whether to finish the work. There is a difference between an abstract and footnote as much as they both summarize an article.
A footnote is more than just a synopsis or any other publication because it offers a distinctive description concerning an item. Footnotes can be critical and evaluative in different forms, unlike an abstract. Majorly, the footnote has arranged lists like an alphabetical one. It's different from another bibliography because its implication is followed by a paragraph length of which, in this case, it's only 150-250 words.
With that, we hope that you've learned a great deal concerning how to write an annotated bibliography.